Deutsche Bank: The global sustainability charge

Joe Biden’s Build Back Better and the EU’s Green Deal pave the way for a revolution in sustainable investing, say Deutsche Bank’s Dominik Thumfart and Jeremy Eisman.

This article is sponsored by Deutsche Bank

How has covid-19 highlighted pre-existing sustainability themes?

Dominik Thumfart

Dominik Thumfart: Lockdowns have dramatically reduced air traffic and to a lesser extent road traffic – with a rise in e-commerce offsetting a reduction in car travel. That’s had a profound effect on the environment. In the spring of last year, the impact in London, for example, was clearly visible in terms of better air quality and the Venice canals became cleaner within a few weeks. This has shown the world that it’s possible to effectively address climate change. Those lofty targets are not as remote as they once might have seemed. Meanwhile, the digitisation of office jobs has proven that many operations can be run in a digitised format, which will mean less travel even as covid subsides.

What impact will that have on transportation infra?

Jeremy Eisman

Jeremy Eisman: Covid is making people more cautious about using public transportation, which is divergent with the goals of sustainability. But the pandemic is also creating an opportunity for governments and municipalities to rethink their public transportation networks. In New York, for example, the future of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which has been debated for years, is now under scrutiny once again. The combination of covid, and the understanding that a city’s core transportation network cannot be brought to a halt whenever we face a crisis of this nature, together with the sustainability focus of both the NY Governor’s office and the new Biden administration, creates an enormous opportunity for fresh thinking.

The confluence of those two factors could lead to real change.

Are we seeing a shift in policy response in Europe that could lead to sustainable infrastructure opportunities?

DT: The fact that one of President Biden’s key initiatives is known as Build Back Better indicates that infrastructure is going to be a big component of the economic stimulus programme in the US. In the EU, the comparable trademark policy is the Green Deal. Public policy, public procurement, any subsidies awarded to new sectors, will all be considered in the context of sustainability.

There’s also been a lot of debate already in financing circles regarding the EU Taxonomy. That’s basically a set of parameters that sets performance thresholds for all economic activities.

To comply with the EU Taxonomy, you need to make a substantial contribution to at least one of six environmental objectives including climate change mitigation, adaptation, protection of water and marine resources and the transition to a circular economy. You must also do no significant harm to any of those objectives.

Those parameters will have a real impact on the infrastructure sector. For example, when the French government provided financial support to Air France last year, it was made on the basis that the airline shut down air traffic links between Paris and several regional cities where there is already a high-speed rail link. Once covid slips from the front pages, focus on climate change will come back with a vengeance, not just in terms of clean power generation, but in terms of the decarbonisation of entire industries too.

Now the US is on board with sustainability, is it Asia, and other emerging markets, that are the laggards?

DT: From a Deutsche Bank perspective, absolutely not. The region’s been leading the charge within the bank with the appointment of Kamran Khan to the newly created role of head of ESG in Asia-Pacific last year. His remit is to advise on sustainability-linked product offerings across the corporate and investment banks, the DWS asset management operation and the private bank.

Indeed, Asia is a big market for us. Around half of the global population lives there. In recent years, it has accounted for around two-thirds of global economic growth. Several of the countries have fantastic solar and wind resources and, across the region, the energy transition’s a major theme.

Pre-covid, a pronounced urbanisation trend has created rising demand for bigger and more efficient infrastructure, from municipal transport to social infra such as schools and hospitals. Meanwhile, several countries in Asia, the Middle East and Africa are building new regional, and even central, capitals.

Take Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, for example. Those are metropoles where everything from transportation to power and social infra will need to be started from scratch – and the sustainability of these once-in-a generation projects will be fully in focus.

JE: Latin America is also an exciting market where several governments are advanced in their treatment of ESG matters. And once the US starts its sustainability engine back up again, there will be plenty of opportunities to deploy innovation into the region and other emerging markets.

Are environmental considerations still dominating the sustainability agenda or has covid placed a priority on social infra?

DT: In May 2020, Deutsche Bank announced a commitment to pour
€200 billion into sustainable financing and ESG investments by 2025. That commitment by our board trickles down into every single business line in terms of concrete lending, investment and debt arranging targets. The bank´s commitment to ESG includes not just environmental concerns but social concerns too. We finance schools and universities and care homes, for example. Facilitating more and better services to help bridge the social divide is an important part of what we do. 

JE: The US market is slightly different because much of the MUSH (municipalities, universities, schools and hospitals) clients have access to the municipal bond market. However, we definitely see social opportunities elsewhere.

We recently arranged a social housing CMBS deal in the UK, for example, which was priced more tightly than its peers because of its social certification – in other words, its ESG credentials.

And environmental sustainability is not just about renewables. We see opportunities in financing carbon capture technology, which is another big focus of the Biden administration, as well recycling, battery production, waste-to-energy plants – anything that has a net positive benefit to sustainability. With the exception of energy storage, where battery technology seems to improve materially year-on-year, many of these technologies have been around for some time. The main changes have come about through regulatory and policy incentives as well as the quantum of capital which is seeking to be deployed in these spaces. As demand for these investments has increased, the returns required have reduced, making many of the opportunities more economic, which is creating a lot of opportunity for both equity and debt investors.

DT: I agree that there are a lot of technologies out there, beyond renewable power. I’d add biofuels and smart metering, for example. We’re also currently working on a desalination plant in an emerging market. Some equity investors we work with are constantly pushing the boundaries of what can be considered sustainable infrastructure.

Long before covid, an infrastructure investor identified the stable revenues generated by medical labs in certain countries. We even last year financed a business that services the global salmon farming industry. The infra theme there was the rising demand for protein as a result of global population growth.

Is the financing market responding with ESG innovation of its own?

DT: We’re seeing lot of innovation around sustainability-linked financing, where the cost of finance is linked to the achievements of certain ESG targets.

For example, our capital markets business worked with a rice producer in Asia to help optimise its financing dependent on it achieving a set of environmental targets around water usage and fertilisers. We expect to see a lot of that innovation make its way into the infrastructure space.

Just how important is the election of Joe Biden when it comes to sustainable infrastructure investment?

Jeremy Eisman: There will be a fundamental change in the way, not just infrastructure investing, but all investing takes place. Biden’s election represents a significant about-face in policy direction, after four years in which the Trump administration appeared to be actively discouraging addressing sustainability issues, whether by removing methane emissions requirements for oil and gas producers or discouraging pension funds from incorporating non-economic considerations, such as ESG, in their allocation decisions. Biden has turned all that on its head and gone further even than the Obama administration in implementing robust ESG policies. Even if he only remains for one term, many of these changes are unlikely to ever be reversed.

One of Biden’s longer-dated pledges is for the US to become a 100 percent clean energy economy by 2050. That timeline will clearly exceed his mandate, even if he does get a second term. But it’s still a deeply significant commitment, which validates long-term investment in a sustainable future. Re-joining the Paris Accord is another important symbolic gesture, signalling to the rest of the world that global warming is again something the US is taking seriously. The $5 trillion expected to be invested in green energy, including $1.7 trillion of federal government spending, has also grabbed attention.

That said, some of the more subtle changes could prove more important. For example, the fact that climate change now has to be addressed as part of every decision the federal government makes, whether that involves foreign policy, national security or trade in material. When you think about the spending power of the US government, within the US and globally, that will create a huge amount of sustainability momentum. Finally, the new administration is encouraging listed companies to disclose on a range of ESG matters, everything from environmental sustainability to social issues such as the diligence to ensure socially responsible supply chains. And it isn’t just the regulators demanding that disclosure. BlackRock, for example, has said it will request this information from all its portfolio companies. When you have an AUM of nearly $8 trillion, that matters. The competition won’t likely want to be left behind, so pretty soon this will become standard in the market.